Skip to main content
Meme CoinsUnderstanding the Technology Behind Meme Coins

Differences in Technology: Meme Coins vs. Major Cryptocurrencies

By April 21, 2024No Comments

Underlying Blockchain Technology

Meme coins, such as Dogecoin and Shiba Inu, have gained significant popularity in recent years, but their underlying technology differs from that of major cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum. While meme coins often leverage existing blockchain platforms, they may not prioritize technological advancements to the same extent as their more established counterparts.

Many meme coins are built on well-known blockchain platforms, including Ethereum, Binance Smart Chain, and Polygon. These platforms offer a range of features that make them attractive for meme coin development, such as:

  • Security: Established blockchain platforms employ robust security measures to protect against hacking and manipulation.
  • Flexibility: Smart contract functionality allows for the creation of complex token economics and governance structures.
  • Scalability: Some platforms, like Polygon, offer faster transaction speeds and lower fees compared to Ethereum.

However, while these platforms provide a solid foundation, meme coins may not fully utilize their technological capabilities. According to research, meme coin development often focuses more on community engagement and viral marketing rather than technological innovation.

In contrast, major cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum were designed from the ground up to solve specific problems and push the boundaries of blockchain technology. For example:

  • Bitcoin: Satoshi Nakamoto created Bitcoin as a decentralized, peer-to-peer electronic cash system, introducing the groundbreaking Proof-of-Work consensus mechanism [Source].
  • Ethereum: Vitalik Buterin developed Ethereum as a decentralized, Turing-complete platform for building smart contracts and decentralized applications (dApps) [Source].

These cryptocurrencies have dedicated development teams that continuously work on improving their underlying technology, with a focus on enhancing security, scalability, and decentralization. For instance, Ethereum is currently undergoing a multi-phase upgrade to Ethereum 2.0, which will transition the network from Proof-of-Work to the more energy-efficient Proof-of-Stake consensus mechanism [Source].

In summary, while meme coins leverage existing blockchain platforms, they may not prioritize technological advancement to the same degree as major cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum. As the meme coin space evolves, it remains to be seen whether these projects will invest more heavily in innovative blockchain solutions.

Token Economics and Supply

The token economics and supply of meme coins differ significantly from those of major cryptocurrencies, which can have a substantial impact on their value and stability. While cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin have a limited supply, meme coins often have an unlimited or extremely large supply, leading to potential inflation and volatility.

One of the key features of Bitcoin is its scarcity. Bitcoin has a hard cap of 21 million coins, which is built into its protocol [Source]. This limited supply helps maintain Bitcoin’s value over time and protects it from inflation. In contrast, many meme coins have a much larger or even unlimited supply:

  • Dogecoin: Unlike Bitcoin, Dogecoin has no hard cap on its supply. As of March 2023, there were over 132 billion Dogecoins in circulation [Source].
  • Shiba Inu: Shiba Inu has a total supply of 1 quadrillion tokens, with 50% of the supply locked in Uniswap and the other 50% burned to Vitalik Buterin’s wallet [Source].

The vast supply of meme coins can lead to significant price fluctuations and potential devaluation over time. As more tokens are minted or released into circulation, the value of each individual token may decrease, especially if demand does not keep pace with the increasing supply.

Furthermore, meme coins are often created with the primary goal of generating hype and encouraging speculative trading rather than providing real-world utility. According to a report by CoinGecko, the meme coin market is largely driven by social media sentiment and viral trends rather than fundamental value or technological innovation.

This focus on hype and speculation can make meme coins particularly vulnerable to pump-and-dump schemes and sudden price crashes. Research has shown that meme coins are more susceptible to market manipulation and extreme price volatility compared to established cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum.

In contrast, major cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum have clear use cases and are designed to function as decentralized, secure, and efficient payment systems or platforms for building decentralized applications. Their token economics are carefully designed to support these use cases and ensure long-term sustainability.

As the meme coin space continues to evolve, it remains to be seen whether these projects will adopt more sustainable token economic models and focus on developing real-world utility to support their value propositions.

Decentralization and Security

Decentralization and security are crucial aspects of any cryptocurrency, and this is where meme coins often fall short compared to major cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum. While established cryptocurrencies are built on secure, decentralized networks, meme coins may lack the robust security measures and decentralization needed to protect users and maintain the integrity of the network.

Recent research has highlighted the security vulnerabilities present in many meme coins. A study by BeinCrypto found that a staggering 91% of meme coins on Coinbase’s Base platform have security vulnerabilities, including:

  • Lack of locked liquidity: Unlocked liquidity pools can be exploited by malicious actors, leading to significant price fluctuations and financial losses for investors.
  • Unverified contracts: Without proper verification, smart contracts may contain hidden vulnerabilities or malicious code that can be exploited by attackers.
  • Honeypots: Some meme coins are designed to trap investors by preventing them from selling their tokens, allowing the creators to drain the liquidity pool and leave investors with worthless assets.

Furthermore, the study found that 17% of the meme coins on Base are suspected to be outright scams, with conditions such as exaggerated “sales taxes” that benefit the creators at the expense of investors.

The lack of security in meme coins can be attributed to several factors, including the ease of creating and launching these tokens, the absence of proper auditing and verification processes, and the limited resources available to many meme coin projects. As a result, investors are at a higher risk of falling victim to scams, hacks, and other malicious activities.

In contrast, major cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum are built on secure, decentralized networks that prioritize transparency, immutability, and resistance to fraud and manipulation. These networks are maintained by a large, global network of nodes and miners who work together to validate transactions and secure the blockchain.

The decentralized nature of these networks ensures that no single entity can control or manipulate the system, providing a high level of security and trust for users. Additionally, the open-source nature of these projects allows for continuous auditing and improvement of the underlying code, further enhancing their security and reliability.

As the meme coin space continues to grow and evolve, it is crucial for projects to prioritize security and decentralization to protect users and maintain the long-term viability of these tokens. Without proper measures in place, meme coins risk losing the trust and support of their communities, potentially leading to their downfall.